A Researcher-Centric Version of the KRDS Activity Model: the I2S2 Project
The Keeping Research Data Safe (KRDS) project has produced a widely used KRDS Activity Model for costing digital preservation of research data. KRDS has developed from relatively small-scale incremental projects and we recognise that there were still significant areas for future work such as the recently published (Dec 2010) KRDS User Guide. The KRDS2 final report published earlier last year outlined a number of key recommendations for future development including:
- “Examine further development of the pre-archive phase of the KRDS2 activity model and produce versions of the model from a researcher’s perspective.”
This suggested work has now been addressed by one of the outputs from the Infrastructure for Integration in Structural Sciences (I2S2) Project funded under the Research Data Management Infrastructure strand of the JISC’s Managing Research Data Programme.
I2S2 has been using KRDS as a basis for costing and benefits analysis. One of the outputs has been an “Idealised Scientific Research Data Lifecycle Model”, which seeks to extend and adapt from a “researcher perspective”, the Keeping Research Data Safe (KRDS) Activity Model, providing a model which reflects “research data management” or the digital preservation lifecycle in its broadest interpretation. It adapts KRDS from an archive-centric to a researcher-centric view by:
- Defining and emphasising more of the activities in the research (KRDS “Pre-Archive” ) phase where research data is created;
- Adding a “Publication” set of activities;
- Concatenating the KRDS “Archive” phase activities in the centre of the model for simplification and presentational purposes;
- Adding some specific local research administration activities;
- In addition for the purposes of the project, it adds some selective detail of information flows and information objects between the activities.
This is the current version (Dec 2010) of the I2S2 Idealised Model.
Note this is an idealised model and several activities such as peer review or conduct experiment may have multiple instances or repetitions. “Documentation, Metadata, and Storage” may also be undertaken as researcher activities independent of the archive in other instances and in the KRDS activity model. It also represents a project view as of December 2010 and may be subject to further changes.
A PPT version of the I2S2 model incorporating relevant notes is available on the I2S2 project website.
The I2S2 project aims to understand and identify the requirements for a data-driven research infrastructure in the Structural Sciences. The work is focused on the exemplar domain of Chemistry, but with a view towards inter-disciplinary application. Current work inter alia includes developing a set of tools and approaches to identify and provide indicators and metrics for the benefits arising from I2S2. This will extend work and the tools available for implementing the KRDS Benefits Taxonomy.
The partners in I2S2 are UKOLN (University of Bath), the Digital Curation Centre, University of Southampton, University of Cambridge, Science & Technology Facilities Council, and Charles Beagrie Ltd.
0 comments neil | Charles Beagrie Ltd, Digital Curation, e-Research, Science and Industry, Uncategorized, Universities