<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google pulls its research datasets service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.beagrie.com/2009/01/22/google-pulls-its-research-datasets-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.beagrie.com/2009/01/22/google-pulls-its-research-datasets-service/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:22:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Rusbridge</title>
		<link>http://blog.beagrie.com/2009/01/22/google-pulls-its-research-datasets-service/comment-page-1/#comment-9684</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Rusbridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.beagrie.com/?p=84#comment-9684</guid>
		<description>Neil, I quite liked Dorothea Salo&#039;s reaction to this,

(http://cavlec.yarinareth.net/2009/01/02/libraries-and-the-commons/) 

and suspect her natural cynicism (!) may have nailed some of the reasons, beyond just the credit crunch...

&quot;... Google turned off its sneakernet mass-data service, before really even turning it on. I have no inside intel on why this happened, but I do have two strong suspicions: one, uptake was  
minimal (which any card-carrying repo-rat could have told Google would happen, but oh well), and two, the sad few contributed datasets werent anything that would set the world on fire, especially given a critical lack of assessment or metadata or organization or anything else that would make the data worth keeping.&quot;

It would be nice to know more of the inside story here...

[comment from posting originally to digital-preservation email list]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, I quite liked Dorothea Salo&#8217;s reaction to this,</p>
<p>(<a href="http://cavlec.yarinareth.net/2009/01/02/libraries-and-the-commons/" rel="nofollow">http://cavlec.yarinareth.net/2009/01/02/libraries-and-the-commons/</a>) </p>
<p>and suspect her natural cynicism (!) may have nailed some of the reasons, beyond just the credit crunch&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; Google turned off its sneakernet mass-data service, before really even turning it on. I have no inside intel on why this happened, but I do have two strong suspicions: one, uptake was<br />
minimal (which any card-carrying repo-rat could have told Google would happen, but oh well), and two, the sad few contributed datasets werent anything that would set the world on fire, especially given a critical lack of assessment or metadata or organization or anything else that would make the data worth keeping.&#8221;</p>
<p>It would be nice to know more of the inside story here&#8230;</p>
<p>[comment from posting originally to digital-preservation email list]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

